| |
Interview with Chuck Harker
:
A Lifetime of Activism for Peace and Justice
By Diane M. Cameron
September, 2004 |
 |
The War Resisters League in 1991 published a Peace Calendar
that featured fifty-two "veterans of social change," edited
by Pat Farren.
Reading these capsule biographies has given me sustenance
when I’ve
teetered on the edge of burnout. "
We can learn a great deal from our elders in activism," Farren
observes. "Most have discovered how to maintain vision
and personal
equilibrium. Some of us are fortunate enough to know a few of these people."
In the Maryland Green Party, we are indeed fortunate to
know a few of these elders in activism.
These veterans of social change include Maryland
Green Party founders Bob Auerbach and Joe and Rose Marie Flynn.
This group of our elders also includes Montgomery Green
Chuck Harker.
I first met Chuck when we both spoke out against the Iraq
War at a County Council meeting. On
February 5, 2003, the Montgomery County Council
held a so-called "Town Hall Meeting" in Gaithersburg.
I had emailed fellow Greens that this
was an opportunity for us to advocate for a
resolution against the Iraq War (over one hundred other
municipalities, including the city of Chicago, had already
done so). While
sitting with my family in the audience that night, I saw
a tall, distinguished-looking man
in white hair starkly address the Council: "....I
speak as a Navy veteran of World War Two, with the lingering
guilt for our destruction of the innocent men, women and children of Nagasaki and Hiroshima,
even as our armed forces had defeated
the armed forces of Japan and victory was
in sight.....I come to you out of a sense of patriotic
duty
because of my deep concern that a
unilateral decision by the President to go to
war, even without there being an imminent danger, would
be a
disaster for our County, our State,
and our Country, possibly even our Earth."
While Chuck's prophetic words to the Council fell on tin
ears, (our Councilmembers refused even to consider an anti-war
resolution, though they ultimately passed a separate resolution
questioning
the USA Patriot Act), they did inspire me to
seek out Chuck
and to learn more about this remarkable
veteran. I have since protested alongside
him at an anti-ICC rally (he lives in Sandy Springs, along
one of the proposed ICC routes).
And
in a June 23, 2004 visit to his home,
the Friends House retirement community, I met his wife
Eleanore and
several of his friends, and learned how this "happy
war veteran" had
come to make war resistance and peace activism his life's
work. Ensconced in their comfortable apartment at Friends
House, next to a
neat garden and greenhouse, Chuck and Eleanore are Midwesterners
hailing
from Minnesota and Peoria, Illinois.
Chuck was an engineer who was commissioned
from his Northwestern University NROTC to
serve in the Navy in World War II. Just prior to shipping
out in the Pacific Theatre, he and
Eleanor were engaged. During the war, Eleanore,
a strong Quaker, sent Chuck a lot of Quaker pamphlets and
books, on the peace movement and
conscientious objection. He is
reluctant to elaborate on his actual experience of the
war, suggesting
that because it was, paradoxically,
generally positive, it would only confound his family
and friends
who’ve since come to know him
as a committed peace worker.
To help explain this paradox of his
World War Two experience, he reaches for a book: Chris
Hedges’ War Is a Force That Gives Us Meaning. It
was only later, Chuck
reflects, after the war, when he came home and married
Eleanore and
started attending Quaker meetings, that all of the "peace
studies' he'd
undertaken took root within him.
Chuck notes that he is a peace worker, not a pacifist.
When he resigned
his Navy commission and became subject to the draft after
WWII ended, he
registered as a 1AO, someone willing to wear the uniform
but unwilling
to use weapons. Chuck says that this continues to be his
position
regarding military service.
Shortly after the war, Chuck’s father, who’d
also been in the Navy, invited Chuck
to attend meetings at his local American Legion post. Chuck,
who had become convinced that "Veterans oughtta
be carrying the banner for peace," tried
to get a peace resolution through his American
Legion local. "When they wouldn’t support it," Chuck
recalls, "I walked out." That
experience taught Chuck that he needed to practice
more patience: "You don’t cast judgement on
those who don’t agree with
you. Instead, you just keep on working
with them, and working through your disagreements." This philosophy
is reflected in his Green Party work, especially in his
ongoing recruitment efforts among his fellow residents
of Friends House.
Many of Friends House residents are progressive-liberal
Democrats who come from within the
Quaker activist tradition. Chuck has worked hard
over the years to represent the Green Party to his friends
and
to persuade them to join the Party.
Thanks in part to Chuck's constant,
recruitment efforts, there are now about ten Green Party
members living at Friends House.
| Chuck Harker listens to fellow Green Party member
and Friends House
resident Pat Weiss |
 |
"It's been a very tough, uphill battle," Chuck
says. Although as Quakers they are
not comfortable with the Democratic Party's militarism;
they see it as
the only viable alternative, and they are
very reluctant to leave it. "But I keep trying,” affirms Chuck. Such an
approach is typical of a man
whose basic philosophy is to "keep
on working, and not worrying about results....I
don’t get frustrated anymore.” Chuck asserts.
Shortly after the American Legion
incident, Chuck resigned his Naval Officers'
commission and became a Quaker. He signed on with Caterpillar
Tractor Company as an engineer and manager in their Peoria facility.
The Harkers had three children of their own and "virtually adopted
a fourth." They
count themselves blessed with seven
grandchildren. About fifteen years later, in 1960, the
Friends Committee
on National Legislation (FCNL) asked Chuck to come to Washington to become one of eight on the staff.
A major part of Chuck's FCNL work was interpreting the
legislative action to the wider Quaker community and he
traveled widely in the United States.
Internal conflict within even the
Quaker community continued to challenge Chuck's inclusive vision.
But through that experience, Chuck
learned that open discussion of differences and
listening to one another could lead to unity, if not unanimity,
that strengthened
everyone in the effort.
As an FCNL staffer, Chuck worked
on a variety of bills and initiatives
and demonstrations related to the War
in Vietnam, Civil Rights (including
the Southern Christian Leadership Council's Poor Peoples Campaign
after the murder of Dr. Martin Luther King); as well as resistance
to, and education on ending the draft. Chuck refers me
to the
1975 book, Uphill for Peace: Quaker Impact on Congress,
by E. Raymond
Wilson, for a description of FCNL’s work during Chuck’s
tenure there.
One action that Chuck remembers well is the FCNL's organizing congressional
visits for retired military officers, corporate executives and medical relief workers with direct experience of what
our military forces and the people
of Vietnam were experiencing. "We
took them around Capitol Hill so they
could tell their representatives and other members
of Congress just what their experience of the war had been
and why it needed to end."
Listening to Chuck tell this story, I hope that today’s
retired officers
and Iraq War Veterans have ample opportunity to describe
their experiences and their views
to members of Congress. Chuck's views on the need for peacemaking
and resistance to the draft were deepened by the
experience of his son "who spent
two years in prison because of his
refusal to register for the draft in 1968, on the
basis of his conscientious objection to service in the
military."
Also around that time, Chuck realized that his work was
becoming less effective because of
his deep frustration with the escalation of the Vietnam
war, the refusal of so many mainstream Americans to see
the reality of that war, and the loss
of the Presidential election by Vice President
Hubert Humphrey, “who refused to criticize
President Johnson for his escalation of the war.”
So Chuck resigned and took up a job as an apartment manager
in Southwest D.C. Meanwhile, Eleanore
was a teacher at the lower school of Sidwell Friends.
Chuck maintained his activism throughout this time, in
a new way: he got involved in welfare rights and housing
justice issues.
Chuck's inclusive philosophy of acceptance, and continual
engagement with people, keeps coming
back into our conversation. In these times of increasing
anxiety and fear about world affairs and the direction
of U.S. politics, and withering internal
tensions within progressive organizations
including the Green Party, Chuck's "long
view" is reassuring: "It's
not a matter of a single person's work or career," observes
Chuck. "It's not a matter of ten years, it's
not even just one person's lifetime" that
is the measure of success or failure of our movement
for peace and justice....but rather, "it's
longer, much longer, than that. It's a matter of the evolution of our thinking,
of our
beliefs. I'm optimistic that things will change, that this
country will adopt the role of peacemaker
and not continue to fuel the war
machine. It's not important to me that I may not see this
happen in my lifetime. I see it happening, little by little. I see
the signs all around me." And
he sees the growth of the Green Party as one of the
most important and
hopeful signs.
The current tensions within the Green Party,
and in particular, between
the equally flinty supporters of Green
Party Presidential Candidate David Cobb, and those
backing Populist Party candidate Ralph Nader, are to Chuck
simply a
normal part of the natural process within a progressive
movement, a
process that he fondly calls "grinding down”:
"The grinding that's going on now, within the Green
Party, is a learning
process that'll ultimately make things
smooth. We should deal with it, and stay with the process,
and not turn our backs on it. We should grind it out with those
who disagree with us, work things out, even though it's
a painful process, because it moves
everybody forward in the end. The consensus
process (used by both Quakers and Greens) is a grinding process.
I have faith in this grassroots process." Similarly,
Chuck was intrigued by Peter Camejo’s "Unity" proposal
prior to the June 2004
Milwaukee convention, because he liked
the idea of having the State parties work things out.
"I see the Green Party as the coming thing in the
country's electoral process. The two-party
system has got to go. The strength of the Green
Party is in its 'People Action..' We will just keep on
making inroads into holding elected
offices. The Courts have upheld the [Green Party] Mayor of New Paltz, New York, Jason West,
for his right to officiate over gay
weddings. This is evidence of the progress that
Greens are making in elected offices nationwide."
Chuck
observes that Greens are creating our own new patterns
of campaigning, free from "the
big money/ big media cycle that the two major
parties are locked into." As evidence, he cites
Linda Schade's run in 2002 for the Maryland General Assembly, in which
her "sidewalk campaign" consisted
of waving to motorists along major routes: "Linda demonstrated
that there's nothing like getting out on the sidewalk and talking directly to people."
Being an anti-war and ecology activist over the past twenty
years has
severely challenged my sense of hope for the future. But
if Chuck Harker
is still going strong for the Green Party in his 80s, after
sixty years
of activism, then I too can keep going. “In our lifetimes,” reflects
Chuck, “we give what we can. And then, we have to
look beyond that, we
have to say, ‘This is a building process.’ And
I really believe that
this is happening. I have to believe that it’s a
different world, a
better world.”
|