November 2006


elections30 Nov 2006 03:24 pm
by karma432

Richard Winger of Ballot Access News has calculated the total number of votes in top of the ballot races nationwide (governor in 36 states and senate in 11 states).

 In total, independents and third party candidates got 5% of the vote–the second highest off year total since 1934. 

The Green Party was the top third party, getting just under a million votes in 24 states or 1.1%.  Libertarians were second with just under 800,000 in 27 states, and the Constitution Party a distant third with 200,000 in 12 states.

The Green Party has emerged as the top third party, with particularly strong showings in Maine and Illinois.  In some major cities such as Baltimore and D.C., the Green Party is close to passing Republicans as the second party.

We are starting to build bases of support around the country.  We need to work to build on the vote we got this year.

Politics & News & Nonviolence17 Nov 2006 10:38 pm
by karma432

The annual protest of the U.S. Army’s School of the Americas at Fort Benning, Georgia grows each year, hitting nearly 20,000 last year.  This year simultaneous protests will take place in Santiago, Bogota, San Slavador and several other Latin American cities.

Since 1946, the SOA has trained more than 60,000 Latin American soldiers.  The Pentagon has acknowledged that in the past the SOA used training manuals advocating coercive interrogation methods and extra-judicial executions. Many SOA graduates have subsequently been linked to many of the worst human rights abuses in Latin America.

In recent years, reformist governments have brought to power many people who were at one time thrown in prison and tortured.  These governments are cutting their ties to the SOA and rethinking their relation to the US military.  Roy Bourgeois, the Catholic priest who founded SOA Watch has met with government officials in Caracas, Montevideo and Buenos Aires, encourging these countries to abandon ties with the SOA, and plans to visit five more countries next year.

Although the Bush administration has made public plans to further militarize Latin America, Democrats in Congress hope to cut funding for the SOA.   Increasing public awareness will be an important factor determining whether they succeed or not.

Community Based Economics & Future Focus/Sustainability16 Nov 2006 04:00 pm
by karma432

Van Jones exemplifies the difference between the Green and environmental movements.  Jones promotes environmentally sustainable business practices in Oakland, and hopes to provide jobs for urban youth in the process.

We need to expand and transform our definition of environmentalism. . . . Rather than talking about environmental solutions as business opportunities for the rich or consumer choices for the affluent, we should be talking about them as job-creating, wealth-creating, health-enhancing opportunities for poor people.For example, one solution for global warming is renewable energy. Not only could it save polar bears in the Arctic Circle, it could create jobs for urban youths who are putting up solar panels. It could also offer wealth-building opportunities for middle-class, working-class people who could invest in those companies.

Oakland is building green enterprise zones to bring in eco-friendly business and industry.  At they same time they are working with community colleges, labor unions and prison re-entry organizations to create a green job corps where urban youths and workers will be taught to install solar panels, do orbanic gardening or retrofit buildins so they don’t leak energy.

Jones believes that;

The same kids that we are throwing in the garbage can of failed schools and prisons could be the kids who are putting up the solar panels, inventing the new clean-burning diesel fuel or selling organic produce. They are so creative and energetic, but nobody has given them a grand call or a high mission.

This is a message Greens should be bringing to all urban areas.

GP Montgomery County13 Nov 2006 02:47 pm
by karma432

A traditional entry point for people interested in running for political office is the Board of Education.  There is a vacancy now in district 4 (Takoma Park, and parts of Silver Spring and Wheaton), that has opned up since Board member Valerie Ervin was elected to the Montgomery County Council.

Anyone with relevent experience who might be interested in getting into politics on the ground floor should look into this.

 

Board Seeks Applicants for District 4 Vacancy
November 10, 2006

Individuals who live in Board of Education District 4 in Montgomery County are invited to apply for the vacancy created by the pending resignation of Valerie Ervin. Ervin will be leaving the Board because of her election to the Montgomery County Council. The new Council members will be sworn in on December 4, 2006.

The appointment of an individual to complete the remaining two years of the current term will be made by the Board of Education. The appointment process includes a review of submitted applications, personal interviews, voter registration verification, and confirmation of district residency. The Board intends to interview selected candidates on Saturday, December 9, 2006, and expects to complete the appointment process by December 12, 2006.

By law, the individual chosen must be a registered voter of Montgomery County and reside within Board of Education District 4, which encompasses Takoma Park and parts of Silver Spring and Wheaton. The specific precincts that comprise the district can be found in Section 3-901(f)(3)(vii) of the Education Article of the Annotated Code of Maryland. The boundaries of the district also can be identified by calling the Board of Elections at 240-770-8500. An individual who is
subject to the authority of the Board of Education, such as an employee of the school system, may not serve as a member of the Board.

Applications must be received by 5:00 p.m. on November 27, 2006. For additional information about the position, please call Roland Ikheloa, the Board of Education’s chief of staff, at 301-279-3301. Individuals are requested to mail, hand deliver, e-mail, or fax the documents to the Board of Education. The mailing address is 850 Hungerford Drive,
Room 123, Rockville, Maryland 20850. E-mails may be sent to roland_ikheloa@mcpsmd.org. The fax number is 301-279-3860. The names and correspondence of all applicants will be available for public review.

Individuals wishing to be considered for appointment must submit the following:

1. A signed letter expressing the applicant’s desire and willingness to serve on the Board of Education as the District 4 representative with a term ending in November 2008;

2. A brief record of the applicant’s personal history and relevant civic, professional, and other experience (a resume will suffice);

3. A statement certifying that the applicant is a registered voter of Montgomery County and resides in District 4; and

4. Contact information including e-mail addresses and telephone numbers where the applicant can be reached.

 

Instant Runoff Voting09 Nov 2006 09:53 am
by karma432

From Ballot Access News:

 

All four ballot measures to institute alternative voting systems passed on November 7. Oakland, California, passed IRV for city office by 68%. Minneapolis passed IRV for city office by 65%.

Two more advanced forms seem to have passed narrowly. In Pierce County, Washington (that state’s 2nd most populous county, which contains Tacoma), all partisan county offices will apparently no longer have partisan primaries. Instead, there will be a single election in November, using IRV. Although ballot access will be easy for all candidates, party labels will be restricted to those candidates who had won their party’s nomination by convention, in advance of the election. Pierce County now more closely approximates the systems used by Ireland and the Australia than any other jurisdiction in the U.S. 

Finally, Davis passed advisory measure J (with 55%), which provides for Single Transferrable Vote for multi-winner offices such as City Council-at-large. Like all California elections for city office, Davis uses non-partisan elections. However, Davis will now apparently share the characteristic of Cambridge, Massachusetts, under which an organized minority of voters can place a candidate on the city council if that minority comprises approximately 25% (in Cambridge the threshold is lower than 25%, because Cambridge elects more members to its city council).

 

  

Politics & News09 Nov 2006 09:45 am
by adam

I’d be surprised if he wasn’t confirmed, but in the interest of basic history, here’s some good info on him:

    During contentious Senate confirmation hearings in October 1991 - which are bound to come up again - Gates’s role in cooking intelligence information during the Iran-Contra scandal was revealed. It was during those hearings that senators found out about a December 2, 1986, 10-page classified memo written by Thomas Barksdale, the CIA analyst for Iran. That memo claimed that covert arms sales to the country demonstrated “a perversion of the intelligence process” that is staggering in its proportions.

    The Barksdale memo was used by Gates’s detractors to prove he played an active role in slanting intelligence information during his tenure at the agency under Reagan. Eerily reminiscent of the way CIA analysts were treated by Vice President Dick Cheney during the run-up to the Iraq war three years ago, when agents were forced to provide the Bush administration with intelligence showing Iraq was a nuclear threat, Barksdale said he and other Iran analysts “were never consulted or asked to provide an intelligence input to the covert actions and secret contacts that have occurred.”

    Barksdale added that Gates was the pipeline for providing “exclusive reports to the White House,” intelligence that was “at odds with the overwhelming bulk of intelligence reporting, both from U.S. sources and foreign intelligence services.”

More at Truthout

Politics & News & Essays/Opinions & Energy & Iraq03 Nov 2006 11:39 am
by Administrator
And today’s, presented as a service.  Emphasis, ours.

November 3, 2006

Op-Ed Columnist

Insulting Our Troops, and Our Intelligence

By THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN

George Bush, Dick Cheney and Don Rumsfeld think you’re stupid. Yes, they do.

They think they can take a mangled quip about President Bush and Iraq by John Kerry — a man who is not even running for office but who, unlike Mr. Bush and Mr. Cheney, never ran away from combat service — and get you to vote against all Democrats in this election.

Every time you hear Mr. Bush or Mr. Cheney lash out against Mr. Kerry, I hope you will say to yourself, “They must think I’m stupid.” Because they surely do.

They think that they can get you to overlook all of the Bush team’s real and deadly insults to the U.S. military over the past six years by hyping and exaggerating Mr. Kerry’s mangled gibe at the president.

What could possibly be more injurious and insulting to the U.S. military than to send it into combat in Iraq without enough men — to launch an invasion of a foreign country not by the Powell Doctrine of overwhelming force, but by the Rumsfeld Doctrine of just enough troops to lose? What could be a bigger insult than that?

What could possibly be more injurious and insulting to our men and women in uniform than sending them off to war without the proper equipment, so that some soldiers in the field were left to buy their own body armor and to retrofit their own jeeps with scrap metal so that roadside bombs in Iraq would only maim them for life and not kill them? And what could be more injurious and insulting than Don Rumsfeld’s response to criticism that he sent our troops off in haste and unprepared: Hey, you go to war with the army you’ve got — get over it.

What could possibly be more injurious and insulting to our men and women in uniform than to send them off to war in Iraq without any coherent postwar plan for political reconstruction there, so that the U.S. military has had to assume not only security responsibilities for all of Iraq but the political rebuilding as well? The Bush team has created a veritable library of military histories — from “Cobra II” to “Fiasco” to “State of Denial” — all of which contain the same damning conclusion offered by the very soldiers and officers who fought this war: This administration never had a plan for the morning after, and we’ve been making it up — and paying the price — ever since.

And what could possibly be more injurious and insulting to our men and women in Iraq than to send them off to war and then go out and finance the very people they’re fighting against with our gluttonous consumption of oil? Sure, George Bush told us we’re addicted to oil, but he has not done one single significant thing — demanded higher mileage standards from Detroit, imposed a gasoline tax or even used the bully pulpit of the White House to drive conservation — to end that addiction. So we continue to finance the U.S. military with our tax dollars, while we finance Iran, Syria, Wahhabi mosques and Al Qaeda madrassas with our energy purchases.

Everyone says that Karl Rove is a genius. Yeah, right. So are cigarette companies. They get you to buy cigarettes even though we know they cause cancer. That is the kind of genius Karl Rove is. He is not a man who has designed a strategy to reunite our country around an agenda of renewal for the 21st century — to bring out the best in us. His “genius” is taking some irrelevant aside by John Kerry and twisting it to bring out the worst in us, so you will ignore the mess that the Bush team has visited on this country.

And Karl Rove has succeeded at that in the past because he was sure that he could sell just enough Bush cigarettes, even though people knew they caused cancer. Please, please, for our country’s health, prove him wrong this time.

Let Karl know that you’re not stupid. Let him know that you know that the most patriotic thing to do in this election is to vote against an administration that has — through sheer incompetence — brought us to a point in Iraq that was not inevitable but is now unwinnable.

Let Karl know that you think this is a critical election, because you know as a citizen that if the Bush team can behave with the level of deadly incompetence it has exhibited in Iraq — and then get away with it by holding on to the House and the Senate — it means our country has become a banana republic. It means our democracy is in tatters because it is so gerrymandered, so polluted by money, and so divided by professional political hacks that we can no longer hold the ruling party to account.

It means we’re as stupid as Karl thinks we are.

I, for one, don’t think we’re that stupid. Next Tuesday we’ll see.

 

Essays/Opinions & Ecological Wisdom & Future Focus/Sustainability & Energy & Environment & global warming & foreign policy03 Nov 2006 10:01 am
by Administrator
Presented as a service, again….

October 27, 2006

Op-Ed Columnist

Allies Dressed in Green

By THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN

Heidelberg, Germany

Since the fall of the Berlin Wall, the Western allies have been asking: What will replace the threat of communism as the cement that holds together the Atlantic alliance? Some have argued terrorism, but I don’t think so. I think my German friends have the best idea: the issue that will and should unite the West is energy and all its challenges.

After all, nothing is a bigger threat today to the Western way of life and quality of life than the combination of climate change, pollution, species loss, and Islamist radicalism and petro-authoritarianism — all fueled by our energy addictions. And no solution is possible to these problems without concerted government actions to reduce emissions, to inspire green innovation and to shift from oil to renewable power.

Therefore, green is not just the new red, white and blue — the next great American national security project — it should also be the color, focus and cement of the Atlantic alliance in the 21st century. As a German official remarked to me, “The whole issue has the potential of becoming a big trans-Atlantic project at a time when we have no other good big project that [embodies] a vision.”

The intertwined environmental and energy challenges we face today are so acute that they can no longer be addressed by “virtuous individuals hopping on a bus instead of taking the car,” argued Jonathan Freedland, a columnist for the British newspaper The Guardian. “This is a job for government.”

Germany’s foreign minister, Frank-Walter Steinmeier, recently gave a major address on how “energy security will strongly influence the global security agenda in the 21st century.” And Britain’s foreign secretary, Margaret Beckett, just delivered a speech declaring that climate change “is not just an environmental problem. It is a defense problem. It is a problem for those who deal with economics and development, conflict prevention, agriculture, finance, housing, transport, innovation, trade and health.”

The fact that the foreign ministers are making this their agendas suggests that energy will soon move to the heart of the alliance’s agenda. As Mr. Freedland put it, “If climate change is a foreign policy problem, foreign policy can surely be part of the climate change solution.”

However, for what I call “geo-greenism” — thinking about green in strategic terms — to become the new core of the alliance, European greens will have to become more “geo” and the U.S. government more “green.”

European Green parties have tended to wrap their environmentalism in a very high-minded tone that was always more moralizing than strategic. For instance, Europe’s Greens led the global campaign against genetically modified crops, which will be critically important if we want to grow more of our fuel — à la corn ethanol or soy biodiesel. The Greens in Germany also forced the previous government to agree to phase out Germany’s nuclear power plants by 2021. That would mean uninstalling 30 percent of Germany’s energy capacity. It would be great if it were all replaced by wind or solar power, but it will most likely be replaced by coal.

Jürgen Hogrefe, who was spokesman for the Green Party in Lower Saxony, Germany, in the 1980s, is today a senior executive with EnBW, a German energy company with nuclear plants.

“The Green Party has been extremely important for German society,” he said, helping to transform the post-Nazi society into a more liberal domain. But an antinuclear stance has been at the core of the party, and now that the German mainstream has embraced a green agenda, the Greens need to rethink nuclear energy. “The Green Party should redefine itself,” added Mr. Hogrefe. “In some fields they are very modern party. … But concerning nuclear energy and ecology they are stubborn, not open enough to see what is happening around the globe.”

One reason President Bush has failed to become the leader of the West is because he has failed to lead on green, which has become so important to all our allies. I doubt that he’ll redefine U.S. policy in his last two years, but the issues around climate change and energy conservation are now rising so fast it’s impossible to imagine that his successor won’t — whoever it is. And once that happens, it is impossible to imagine that living green, instead of fighting reds, won’t become the new glue of the Atlantic alliance.

Or as Hermann Ott, head of the Berlin office of the Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy, remarked to me, “We don’t need aliens to unite our world, we have a problem right at the center” now — and the solution is green.


campaigns01 Nov 2006 10:40 am
by karma432

The Baltimore City Paper has endorsed four Green Party candidates:  Maria Allwine for State Senate in district 43,

The 43rd District offers the best chance in this year’s election to put some Greens in a place where they might be able to offer more than right-on rhetoric, and you can start with Maria Allwine. Legal secretary and peace activist Allwine is unlikely to get many opportunities to exercise her anti-Iraq war passion in Annapolis, but she and her fellow Greens have a plan to “re-Marylandize” the state’s power plants and take back Maryland’s energy future from BGE that we admire, along with their professed dedication to working on behalf of working people instead of special interests (given the tumbleweed-ridden state of their campaign coffers, we believe them on this one). After all, who can argue against full funding of the schools? And while universal health care might be a more contentious issue, again, at root, who doesn’t want to get the care they need when they need it without being cleaned out in the bargain? Incumbent Sen. Conway is seeking her second return trip to the statehouse, but we have trouble mustering much enthusiasm for her re-election. Vote Allwine and see what happens. There’s a slim chance something might actually change.

In the 40th House of Delegates district they have endorsed Jan Danforth:

Jan Danforth of the Green Party, who, working from the Green platform, could bring a much-needed progressive voice to Annapolis. Danforth’s political newbie status makes her a bit of a wildcard, but under the circumstances, she’s a smart bet.

In the 43rd House of Delegates district they endorse Brandy Baker and Dick Ochs:

 We urge you to consider touching the screen for Baker and Ochs, political newcomers but longtime activists and sober-minded concerned citizens. Even [Republican] Girard, a perennial also-ran, agrees with the Green Party that Maryland should attempt to reregulate its power plants, and the Greens’ grass-roots machine perhaps offers them, and us, hope in this race.

Grass roots machine!  Woo Hoo!

While the papers endorses Democrats from Senate and Governor, they do give a serious nod to Kevin before settling back into the lesser evil mode: 

There is no third-party candidate on the Baltimore City ballot this year more substantive than Green Party major domo Kevin Zeese, and we’d like to see him in office–some office–sooner rather than later. But there is an ugly fight under way for control of the U.S. Senate, and the race between the two mainstream-party candidates for this seat has turned fairly ugly as well, with policy differences and records of service largely shoved aside for posturing and misleading hair-splitting. And so we endorse [ugh!!] U.S. Rep. Ben Cardin.

Even Ed gets a wink and a nod in the paper edition of the paper (I’m told).  The front page of the paper lists the names Ehrlich, O’Malley, and Boyd, with Ehrlich and O’Malley crossed out–seemingly a silent acknowledgement of where their hearts are.

Powered by WordPress